Brazilian vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Brazilian
Slovak
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Brazilians
Slovaks
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,856,218 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,555,709 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 3.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Slovak |
Minimum | 2.7% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 56.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.0% | 96.0% |
Mean | 16.6% | 26.8% |
Median | 14.2% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 21.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |