Ute vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Turks
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,537,245 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,078,703 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 58.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Turkish |
| Minimum | 9.2% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 86.0% | 66.7% |
| Range | 76.9% | 66.3% |
| Mean | 34.2% | 13.5% |
| Median | 26.5% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.5% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.7% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.2% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 21.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |