Ute vs Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Jordan
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Jordan
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
80.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,537,245 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,176,549 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 36.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 9.2% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 86.0% | 49.7% |
Range | 76.9% | 48.5% |
Mean | 34.2% | 17.7% |
Median | 26.5% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.5% | 20.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.7% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.2% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 21.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 21.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Slovak (15.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (15.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Venezuela (15.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Brazilian (15.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and French (15.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |