Ute vs Seminole Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Seminole
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ute
Seminole
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Seminole Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,292,292 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 3.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Seminole |
Minimum | 4.6% | 6.2% |
Maximum | 73.0% | 32.8% |
Range | 68.4% | 26.6% |
Mean | 23.1% | 19.4% |
Median | 17.9% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Seminole by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are African (16.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |