Ute vs Black/African American Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Black/African American
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ute
Blacks/African Americans
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Black/African American Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,914,608 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 6.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Black/African American |
Minimum | 4.6% | 11.4% |
Maximum | 73.0% | 45.5% |
Range | 68.4% | 34.1% |
Mean | 23.1% | 21.2% |
Median | 17.9% | 21.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 24.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Blacks/African Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 2.9%), Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 3.0%), Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |