U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Immigrants from Oceania
17.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,511,950 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 17.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 30.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.93% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 45.9% | 44.6% |
Range | 45.0% | 33.9% |
Mean | 16.9% | 16.8% |
Median | 16.8% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 19.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.82%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.91%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |