Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Immigrants from Oceania
17.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,761,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 28.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 43.3% | 44.6% |
| Range | 33.7% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 19.7% | 16.8% |
| Median | 19.3% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.8% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |