Uruguayan vs Puget Sound Salish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Puget Sound Salish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Uruguayans
Puget Sound Salish
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Puget Sound Salish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,837,387 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,841,624 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 9.0% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 83.3% | 40.8% |
Range | 74.3% | 32.2% |
Mean | 32.4% | 20.9% |
Median | 19.7% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.6% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.1% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.7% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.1% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Puget Sound Salish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Canada (20.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.58%), South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |