Uruguayan vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Australian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Uruguayans
Australians
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
25.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,309,932 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 24.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan | Australian |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 22.4% | 73.3% |
| Range | 21.5% | 72.2% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| Median | 5.3% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Morocco (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Liberian (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
| Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
| Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |