English vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
English
Australian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
English
Australians
4.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 562,851,245 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 2.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | English | Australian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 58.9% | 73.3% |
Range | 57.6% | 72.2% |
Mean | 8.9% | 6.5% |
Median | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to English and Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to English are European (4.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Iranian (4.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Belgian (4.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and Dutch (4.2%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |