Tongan vs Chinese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Tongan
Chinese
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Tongans
Chinese
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Chinese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,484,065 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,632,292 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 4.6%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 26.3% | 25.7% |
Range | 23.1% | 23.7% |
Mean | 11.6% | 11.2% |
Median | 11.1% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Chinese by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Bhutanese (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Maltese (11.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Bolivian (11.4%, a difference of 0.40%), Asian (11.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and Turkish (11.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Iran (11.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Korea (11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.5% |