Houma vs Chinese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Houma
Chinese
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Houma
Chinese
22.7%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Chinese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,714,026 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,632,292 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 107.3%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Chinese |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 86.6% | 25.7% |
| Range | 82.1% | 23.7% |
| Mean | 28.1% | 11.2% |
| Median | 24.3% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 5.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Houma by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Crow (22.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Yuman (22.9%, a difference of 0.85%), Sioux (23.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Pueblo (22.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and Navajo (23.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 25.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Iran (11.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Korea (11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.2% |