Tlingit-Haida vs Romanian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Romanian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Romanians
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Romanian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,804,034 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 376,889,400 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Romanian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 22.2% | 52.0% |
| Range | 21.0% | 50.6% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 13.2% |
| Median | 8.1% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Romanians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Basque (8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), French Canadian (8.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Egyptian (8.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |