Immigrants from England vs Romanian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Romanian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Romanians
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Romanian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,846,172 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 376,889,400 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 2.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Romanian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 44.4% | 52.0% |
| Range | 42.8% | 50.6% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 13.2% |
| Median | 9.0% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Romanians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Jordanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Basque (8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), French Canadian (8.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Egyptian (8.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Laotian (8.1%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |