Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from China Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Immigrants from China
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Immigrants from China
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from China Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,854,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,181,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 28.9% | 24.3% |
| Range | 26.3% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 10.4% |
| Median | 11.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from China by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), French (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Norway (10.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |