Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from China Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from China
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from China
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from China Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,930,227 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,181,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 37.1% | 24.3% |
| Range | 36.6% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 10.4% |
| Median | 9.1% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |