Sudanese vs Malaysian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Malaysian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Malaysians
22.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Malaysian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,775,287 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,481,570 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254 and weighted average of 22.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 8.0% | 8.7% |
| Maximum | 48.2% | 72.7% |
| Range | 40.2% | 64.0% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 30.8% |
| Median | 22.1% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 20.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 41.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 20.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 13.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Malaysians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Sudan (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Liberia (22.5%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are French Canadian (22.2%, a difference of 0.0%), French (22.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.40%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
| French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |