Sudanese vs Liberian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Liberian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Liberians
22.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Liberian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,775,287 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,657,601 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 22.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Liberian |
Minimum | 8.0% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 48.2% | 58.7% |
Range | 40.2% | 58.0% |
Mean | 24.5% | 23.0% |
Median | 22.1% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 27.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Liberians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Sudan (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from El Salvador (22.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Belizean (22.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (22.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bahamas (22.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |