Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,175,970 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 3.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Minimum | 0.78% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 31.7% |
Range | 61.7% | 28.7% |
Mean | 15.6% | 12.7% |
Median | 11.1% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Cree (10.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 0.64%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |