Subsaharan African vs British Family Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
British
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
British
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs British Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,449,567 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 37.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | British |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 61.1% |
| Range | 61.7% | 58.4% |
| Mean | 15.6% | 14.8% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 13.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to British by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Slovak (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Asia (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Poland (7.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |