Sri Lankan vs Subsaharan African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Subsaharan African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Sub-Saharan Africans
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Subsaharan African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,414,955 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,393,739 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 23.2%, a difference of 21.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 4.9% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 56.0% | 60.3% |
Range | 51.1% | 57.5% |
Mean | 20.4% | 23.6% |
Median | 18.2% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.0% | 26.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 9.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Russian (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Lithuanian (19.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |