Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Turkey Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Turkey
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Turkey
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Turkey Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,414,955 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,264,730 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370 and weighted average of 19.4%, a difference of 0.96%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Turkey |
Minimum | 4.9% | 13.1% |
Maximum | 56.0% | 29.1% |
Range | 51.1% | 15.9% |
Mean | 20.4% | 18.0% |
Median | 18.2% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.0% | 20.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Turkey by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Russian (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Lithuanian (19.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |