Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Immigrants from Ghana
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Immigrants from Ghana
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,121,787 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,614,936 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.59%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Immigrants from Ghana |
Minimum | 4.4% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 42.1% | 31.3% |
Range | 37.8% | 29.3% |
Mean | 12.4% | 11.0% |
Median | 10.7% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Immigrants from Ghana by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |