Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Ghana
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Ghana
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,735,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,614,936 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 3.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Ghana |
Minimum | 4.7% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 70.6% | 31.3% |
Range | 65.9% | 29.3% |
Mean | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Median | 14.0% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Immigrants from Ghana by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Somali (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |