Spanish American Indian vs Arapaho Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Arapaho
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Arapaho
7.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Arapaho Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,069,372 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,746,597 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 7.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Arapaho |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 21.3% | 33.3% |
Range | 18.4% | 31.9% |
Mean | 7.4% | 11.0% |
Median | 6.0% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Arapaho by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Guatemalan (7.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Hopi (7.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.1%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Haiti (7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Haitian (6.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Lebanon (6.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |