Guyanese vs Arapaho Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Guyanese
Arapaho
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Guyanese
Arapaho
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Arapaho Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,831,984 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,746,597 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guyanese | Arapaho |
Minimum | 0.88% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 13.3% | 33.3% |
Range | 12.4% | 31.9% |
Mean | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Median | 5.6% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Guyanese and Arapaho by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.56%), Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Lebanon (6.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Nepalese (6.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |