South American vs Syrian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
South American
Syrian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
South Americans
Syrians
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
76.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Syrian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,449,574 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,279,372 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Syrian |
Minimum | 0.69% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 34.5% | 80.0% |
Range | 33.8% | 76.2% |
Mean | 15.2% | 17.4% |
Median | 15.1% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 19.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Syrians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |