South American vs South American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
South American
South American Indian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
South Americans
South American Indians
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
35.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs South American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,449,574 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,506,880 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 3.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.69% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 34.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 33.8% | 97.3% |
Mean | 15.2% | 26.4% |
Median | 15.1% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 22.8% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and South American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Uruguay (16.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Scotch-Irish (16.7%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Portugal (16.6%, a difference of 0.90%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and Immigrants from Iraq (16.6%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 43.3 /100 | #180 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 43.2 /100 | #181 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 43.1 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 42.5 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 35.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 16.7% |
South American Indians | 35.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.8% |