Somali vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Chippewa
16.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,282,230 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791 and weighted average of 16.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 0.93%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Somali | Chippewa |
Minimum | 5.5% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 56.1% | 78.4% |
Range | 50.6% | 71.4% |
Mean | 17.8% | 25.6% |
Median | 15.2% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Somalis and Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Mexican (16.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Senegal (16.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and Senegalese (16.5%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |