European vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
European
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Europeans
Chippewa
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,757,214 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 36.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | European | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.9% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 78.4% |
Range | 98.1% | 71.4% |
Mean | 22.2% | 25.6% |
Median | 14.5% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.6% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Europeans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |