Salvadoran vs Cuban Male Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Cuban
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Cubans
12.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
MALE POVERTY
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Cuban Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,602,565 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,765,698 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Salvadoran | Cuban |
Minimum | 2.6% | 0.97% |
Maximum | 28.2% | 23.3% |
Range | 25.5% | 22.4% |
Mean | 12.6% | 12.5% |
Median | 12.2% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Cubans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Nicaraguan (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Fijian (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Armenia (12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Marshallese (12.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Laos (12.6%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Alsatian (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaska Native (12.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (12.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Osage (12.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (12.3%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.2% |
Ugandans | 2.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.1 /100 | #222 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.1 /100 | #223 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.3% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.3% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 12.4% |
Alsatians | 1.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.4% |
Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |
Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |