Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Cuban Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Cuban
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Cubans
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
MALE POVERTY
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Cuban Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,607,111 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.478 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,765,698 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 2.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Cuban |
| Minimum | 0.33% | 0.97% |
| Maximum | 28.0% | 23.3% |
| Range | 27.6% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 12.5% |
| Median | 12.3% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cubans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Ecuadorian (12.7%, a difference of 0.28%), French American Indian (12.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (12.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Alsatian (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaska Native (12.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (12.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Osage (12.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (12.3%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Alsatians | 1.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |