Portuguese vs Puget Sound Salish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Puget Sound Salish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Portuguese
Puget Sound Salish
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Puget Sound Salish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,364,700 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,127,030 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 0.19%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Portuguese | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 0.81% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 25.9% |
Range | 22.3% | 23.9% |
Mean | 8.7% | 9.1% |
Median | 7.5% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Puget Sound Salish by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Icelander (8.3%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Icelander (8.3%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |