Immigrants from Malaysia vs Puget Sound Salish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Puget Sound Salish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Puget Sound Salish
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Puget Sound Salish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,782,180 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,127,030 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 0.69%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Puget Sound Salish |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 26.4% | 25.9% |
| Range | 25.3% | 23.9% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 9.1% |
| Median | 7.1% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Puget Sound Salish by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |