Pennsylvania German vs Ethiopian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Ethiopian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Ethiopians
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Ethiopian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,657,746 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,923,037 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 71.9% | 24.9% |
| Range | 71.1% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 8.5% |
| Median | 8.4% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans and Ethiopians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |