Pennsylvania German vs Bangladeshi Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Bangladeshi
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Bangladeshis
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Bangladeshi Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,657,746 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,248,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 23.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Bangladeshi |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 71.9% | 28.0% |
| Range | 71.1% | 25.9% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 11.3% |
| Median | 8.4% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |