Panamanian vs Mongolian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Panamanian
Mongolian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Panamanians
Mongolians
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
5.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Mongolian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,864,052 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,635,947 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 14.8%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Mongolian |
Minimum | 0.96% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 46.2% |
Range | 99.0% | 44.7% |
Mean | 22.2% | 15.0% |
Median | 18.1% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.0% | 21.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.0% | 9.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Osage (17.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Moroccan (17.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Japanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Iraqi (17.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Thailand | 8.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 17.5% |
Malaysians | 7.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Canadian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
Welsh | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.5% |
Peruvians | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Portuguese | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Icelanders | 87.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.6% |