Lumbee vs Mongolian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Mongolian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Lumbee
Mongolians
31.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Mongolian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,775,991 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 31.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,635,947 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 107.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Mongolian |
| Minimum | 5.4% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 46.2% |
| Range | 94.6% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 42.9% | 15.0% |
| Median | 42.9% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.2% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.7% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 9.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Puerto Rican (32.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and Pima (29.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Canadian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Welsh | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Peruvians | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Portuguese | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Icelanders | 87.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.6% |