Norwegian vs Hawaiian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Hawaiian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Hawaiians
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
37.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Hawaiian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,441,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,430,861 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 21.2%, a difference of 1.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Hawaiian |
Minimum | 3.6% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 45.0% |
Range | 46.4% | 40.5% |
Mean | 24.8% | 23.0% |
Median | 23.2% | 20.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 27.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Hawaiians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.44%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and European (21.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |