Norwegian vs Guyanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Guyanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Guyanese
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Guyanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,441,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,255,160 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.71%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Guyanese |
Minimum | 3.6% | 6.8% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 33.1% |
Range | 46.4% | 26.2% |
Mean | 24.8% | 19.3% |
Median | 23.2% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Guyanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |