New Zealander vs Laotian Family Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Laotian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Laotians
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Laotian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,830,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,550,821 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 0.17%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Laotian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.98% |
| Maximum | 19.9% | 16.8% |
| Range | 18.8% | 15.9% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 7.8% |
| Median | 6.4% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Laotians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Slavic (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |