New Zealander vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Immigrants from South Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Immigrants from South Africa
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,830,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,909,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 0.14%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 19.9% | 30.8% |
Range | 18.8% | 29.4% |
Mean | 7.4% | 8.3% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Immigrants from South Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Slavic (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |