Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Immigrants from South Central Asia
28.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,027,149 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,698,377 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 58.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 8.3% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 73.3% | 35.8% |
Range | 65.1% | 33.8% |
Mean | 37.0% | 15.4% |
Median | 36.0% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.0% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.5% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |