Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Immigrants from South Central Asia
16.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,413,000 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,354,703 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 82.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Minimum | 6.2% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 14.4% |
| Range | 47.3% | 14.0% |
| Mean | 24.0% | 6.6% |
| Median | 21.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.5% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Houma (16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Cheyenne (17.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Ute (16.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Apache (17.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Filipino (9.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |