Mongolian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Mongolian
Slavic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Mongolians
Slavs
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,540,451 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 43.5% | 80.7% |
Range | 41.9% | 80.2% |
Mean | 15.8% | 23.6% |
Median | 15.3% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 28.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |