Central American Indian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Slavic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Central American Indians
Slavs
22.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,193,354 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 22.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 45.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Slavic |
Minimum | 6.7% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.7% |
Range | 93.3% | 80.2% |
Mean | 40.6% | 23.6% |
Median | 32.4% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.0% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.8% | 28.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.8% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.0% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 15.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.77%), Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Yakama (22.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |