Macedonian vs Latvian Poverty
COMPARE
Macedonian
Latvian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Macedonians
Latvians
10.8%
POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Latvian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,607,264 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.328 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,650,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 2.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Latvian |
| Minimum | 0.75% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 21.4% | 52.6% |
| Range | 20.7% | 50.7% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 9.9% |
| Median | 8.5% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Latvians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Iranian (10.7%, a difference of 0.54%), Polish (10.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |