Eastern European vs Latvian Poverty
COMPARE
Eastern European
Latvian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Latvians
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Latvian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,932,283 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,650,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.74%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 39.9% | 52.6% |
Range | 38.2% | 50.7% |
Mean | 11.2% | 9.9% |
Median | 7.9% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans and Latvians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |