Lithuanian vs Russian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Russian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Russians
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Russian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,202,329 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 509,085,697 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 3.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Russian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 45.5% |
Range | 29.6% | 42.3% |
Mean | 8.3% | 10.6% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Russians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |