Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Korea Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Korea
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Korea
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Korea Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,202,329 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,824,351 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 2.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Korea |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 17.2% |
Range | 29.6% | 16.4% |
Mean | 8.3% | 6.5% |
Median | 6.4% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Korea by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.40%), Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |